3 ms·
You think someone who among a repeated pattern of hacking, also deliberately hacks to harass and stalk people doesn't count as dangerous, somehow? Instead of t
by Twirrim 3y ago
You think someone who among a repeated pattern of hacking, also deliberately hacks to harass and stalk people doesn't count as dangerous, somehow?
Instead of throwing him behind bars, they've put him in a place where he can get the dedicated psychiatric help he needs, and will be released once he's had it.
Yet somehow that was the wrong thing to do?
- mrangle 3y agoHe won't be released. He'll be tortured and restrained with pharmacy, with no end. In fact, his autism should preclude him from a sentence in prison or a mental institution. As both of these settings will be much more stressful than they would be for anyone else. Italicizing doesn't give more weight to your attempted point. We need to know the details on the harassing and stalking before society would agree that an open ended sentence to a mental institution is fair. In spite of italicizing. Was he physically "stalking" people or sending snippy emails to people who he thinks bother him? Social judgement of this situation needs to transcend potential abuse of language.
- sdwr 3y agohttps://youtu.be/D04wb7P_v-4?si=ZRfn8V1brJHOeBhC https://youtu.be/D04wb7P_v-4?si=ZRfn8V1brJHOeBhC