4 ms·
1) that’s not JSX, it just looks like it 2) it’s still an external library, which is OPs point
by afavour 3y ago
1) that’s not JSX, it just looks like it
2) it’s still an external library, which is OPs point
- dtagames 3y agoI don't think Lit counts as a framework. It's much lower-level plumbing. And tagged template literals are part of the browser.
- troupo 3y agoBut lit's DSL isn't a part of the browser. Neither is lit's data binding/reactivity. Nor lit's rules on directives. Nor lit's tasks. Nor lit's context. Nor...
- auggierose 3y agoYes, I would agree with that. And that's why "running natively in the browser" is not a remarkable feature of web components, because you will need something like lit anyway for using web components in a productive way. So you might as well use React, or any of the other billion frameworks.