4 ms·

Right, and history started 2 months ago. There was never a partner for peace of course, not when we gave chemical weapons to Saddam, not when we invaded and tur

Right, and history started 2 months ago. There was never a partner for peace of course, not when we gave chemical weapons to Saddam, not when we invaded and turned the place into a shooting gallery for no reason, not when we rejected the talibans offer to turn over bin laden, not when we let him escape into Pakistan, not when we turned Libya into a failed state, not when we invaded somalia, not when we propped up a dictator in iran, not when we sanctioned them for overthrowing the puppet, not when we started the civil war in sudan, not when we supported al-queda, not when we created isis, nope, never a partner for peace. The US has created significant ill will trying to control the middle east, and there are consequences for continuing this path. You think we can solve this problem with more fighting, you dont think that will cause more problems?

aaomidi 3y ago
The US, UK, and Russia are generally hated in the Middle East and for good reason. Norway also failed to hold the various parties that came to agreements in Oslo. Not that they had to, but it would’ve been nice to get the mediator on the record of what the agreement was and how it actually played out.
- golergka 3y ago
  > The US, UK, and Russia are generally hated in the Middle East and for good reason. In Middle East, any given actor hates most other Middle Eastern actors. Hate is not in short supply there.
yard2010 3y ago
You're describing life. This is diplomacy, while we can argue about its effectiveness I'm certain we can agree that it's still better than China, Russia and or Iran. It's just a matter of perspective - the west is the lesser evil here
- r00fus 3y ago
  There's diplomacy and gunboat diplomacy. US seems to always prefer the latter.
- chmod775 3y ago
  >I'm certain we can agree that it's still better than China, Russia and or Iran. I'm not certain that the people living there agree. From their perspective they bled, got betrayed, and had their entire region royally fucked over for decades. To them we are no different from an authoritarian regime. They don't get to vote in our elections. Maybe if the west simply kept their promises a lot of this could have been avoided. "Diplomacy" is pretty hard now, given that our word isn't worth the paper it's written on.
- Geisterde 3y ago
  Im describing a pattern of US involvenent in the middle east that has killed millions of people, actually. Russia never getting a friendly welcome from the rest of europe after the collapse of the soviet union has to try to work with the only other neighbors they have, and havent had nearly as many problems and incurring far less wrath from the arab world as we have. Chinas MO is not to start wars, and to date has not started one, they try to capture countries with debt financing. Depending on whether these debts become exogenous and tools to control the political leadership, as is the case with the US, China too may face these problems, but does not currently. We created what iran is today, and we feed it with every sanction, intentionally.
  - taeric 3y ago
    Unfortunately for the "US is bad" narrative, conflict in the Middle East far predates US involvement. Genocides, ethnic cleansing, forced conversions, and plenty of other atrocities have been happening globally for a long time. These did not come into being with the modern world. This is not to say that there are not valid criticisms of US actions. But the Arab world deserves more criticism than it typically gets.
    - r00fus 3y ago
      Before the US it was the other colonialists (mainly the Dutch and British). And before that it was the Crusades, the story goes way back. The US, EU, etc don't have a "moral" leg to stand on when it's always a colonialist attitude they have over this region.
      - taeric 3y ago
        If you are going back, I'd be shocked if anyone has a moral leg to stand on. The West isn't better because we came from different roots. We didn't. We have improved, though. One of the ways we improved was an honest assessment of our faults. Not perfectly honest, but we have been improving. Much of the rest of the world powers blatantly lie on their morality. Shamefully so.
    - 3y ago
- csomar 3y ago
  So I guess the Houthis are part of life, no?
  - yard2010 3y ago
    Yes and not so long ago Britain was built upon pirating :) Just remember that gunpowder is part of life too

aaomidi 3y ago

The US, UK, and Russia are generally hated in the Middle East and for good reason. Norway also failed to hold the various parties that came to agreements in Oslo. Not that they had to, but it would’ve been nice to get the mediator on the record of what the agreement was and how it actually played out.

golergka 3y ago
> The US, UK, and Russia are generally hated in the Middle East and for good reason. In Middle East, any given actor hates most other Middle Eastern actors. Hate is not in short supply there.

yard2010 3y ago

You're describing life. This is diplomacy, while we can argue about its effectiveness I'm certain we can agree that it's still better than China, Russia and or Iran. It's just a matter of perspective - the west is the lesser evil here

r00fus 3y ago
There's diplomacy and gunboat diplomacy. US seems to always prefer the latter.
chmod775 3y ago
>I'm certain we can agree that it's still better than China, Russia and or Iran. I'm not certain that the people living there agree. From their perspective they bled, got betrayed, and had their entire region royally fucked over for decades. To them we are no different from an authoritarian regime. They don't get to vote in our elections. Maybe if the west simply kept their promises a lot of this could have been avoided. "Diplomacy" is pretty hard now, given that our word isn't worth the paper it's written on.
Geisterde 3y ago
Im describing a pattern of US involvenent in the middle east that has killed millions of people, actually. Russia never getting a friendly welcome from the rest of europe after the collapse of the soviet union has to try to work with the only other neighbors they have, and havent had nearly as many problems and incurring far less wrath from the arab world as we have. Chinas MO is not to start wars, and to date has not started one, they try to capture countries with debt financing. Depending on whether these debts become exogenous and tools to control the political leadership, as is the case with the US, China too may face these problems, but does not currently. We created what iran is today, and we feed it with every sanction, intentionally.
- taeric 3y ago
  Unfortunately for the "US is bad" narrative, conflict in the Middle East far predates US involvement. Genocides, ethnic cleansing, forced conversions, and plenty of other atrocities have been happening globally for a long time. These did not come into being with the modern world. This is not to say that there are not valid criticisms of US actions. But the Arab world deserves more criticism than it typically gets.
  - r00fus 3y ago
    Before the US it was the other colonialists (mainly the Dutch and British). And before that it was the Crusades, the story goes way back. The US, EU, etc don't have a "moral" leg to stand on when it's always a colonialist attitude they have over this region.
    - taeric 3y ago
      If you are going back, I'd be shocked if anyone has a moral leg to stand on. The West isn't better because we came from different roots. We didn't. We have improved, though. One of the ways we improved was an honest assessment of our faults. Not perfectly honest, but we have been improving. Much of the rest of the world powers blatantly lie on their morality. Shamefully so.
  - 3y ago
csomar 3y ago
So I guess the Houthis are part of life, no?
- yard2010 3y ago
  Yes and not so long ago Britain was built upon pirating :) Just remember that gunpowder is part of life too