3 ms·
They seem to define Trap as "situation with high risk of hard-to-reverse lock-ins and growing risks of negative impacts on human well-being" Here's the list:
by codeulike 3y ago
They seem to define Trap as "situation with high risk of hard-to-reverse lock-ins and growing risks of negative impacts on human well-being"
Here's the list:
global traps
1. simplification - increasing specialization produces simplified sub-systems that are vulnerable to shocks
2. growth-for-growth - institutional lock-ins drive pursuit of growth at the cost of well-being
3. overshoot - continued material growth leads to overshoot of Earth system tipping points
4. division - unstable selection for global human cooperation increases risk of international conflict
5. contagion - global connectivity increases the risk of large-scale contagion, e.g. of infectious diseases
technology traps
6. infrastructure lock-in - complex material infrastructure becomes maladaptive, e.g. owing to sunk costs
7. chemical pollution - capacity to produce complex or persistent compounds that can cause long-term harm to humans and ecosystems
8. existential technology - technological arms-races drive the evolution of existential technology, such as weapons of mass destruction
9. technological autonomy - reliance on automation can backfire if systems become misaligned to human needs
10. dis- and misinformation - digitalization can amplify spread of mis- and disinformation e.g. destabilizing democracies
structural traps
11. short-termism - favour of short-term over long-term benefits reinforces other traps and promotes conflict
12. overconsumption - separation of production and consumption facilitates overconsumption
13. biosphere disconnect - separation of human settlements and ecosystems reduces awareness about their benefits
14. local social capital loss - digitalization can lead to loss of local social capital through reduced interaction and echo chambers
- sgu999 3y ago> 9. technological autonomy - reliance on automation can backfire if systems become misaligned to human needs Our economical system is already by and large autonomous and misaligned to our needs, there are humans in the loop but they view the world through symbols. I'm not sure a radically more autonomous technological agent would make any difference...
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- timschmidt 3y agoI find that humans struggle to stack more than some limit of abstractions around those symbols through which they view the world. This necessarily limits the breadth of their understanding. I hope that automated systems can be engineered to better handle deep dependency chains of abstractions to better sort out complicated topics.