3 ms·
> In short, Logseq feels too big, feels too hard to start with, and demands too much at the first impression. If failed to get me, and I failed to get it. This
by sciurus 3y ago
> In short, Logseq feels too big, feels too hard to start with, and demands too much at the first impression. If failed to get me, and I failed to get it.
This is interesting, because it wasn't my experience at all. I migrated from Roam to Logseq after I realized I didn't use enough of the fancier features to justify the price. Basically I open Logseq, take notes in my daily journal, and tag blocks so that I can easily pull them up by topic/person/etc later. That's all it took for me to get started, and also as far as I've felt the need to go. For better or worse I have no idea what other "kitchen sink" features it has.
- bayindirh 3y agoI think, because the reason is what we want from our tools is different. I already use a much sophisticated tool for my tasks, and project planning (Pagico), and what I want is a bona fide desktop wiki which I want to store my technical research and howto docs (and share them in my digital garden). This is what Obsidian is. If I wanted something to organize my tasks and other things, I'd take a much different route. What I'm aiming to get is akin to these: [0] & [1] [0]: https://nick-black.com/dankwiki/index.php/Hack_on https://nick-black.com/dankwiki/index.php/Hack_on [1]: https://notes.joschua.io/ https://notes.joschua.io/
- Sander3Utile 3y agoHey I follow that first guy on Goodreads. Good taste in book he has.