3 ms·
The title is poorly worded, which can be traced back to the FTC's owm wording as quoted in the article. It makes it sound like the FTC is trying to make website
by SuperNinKenDo 3y ago
The title is poorly worded, which can be traced back to the FTC's owm wording as quoted in the article. It makes it sound like the FTC is trying to make websites responsible for things that would be parents' responsibility. But strictly speaking, it is literally correct, as it is shifting (much of) the _burden_ of doing so.
The reforms actually mostly look really good to me.
- speff 3y agoUnsure why this comment was flagged. I took a look at the proposed changes in the press release and it seems like things HN would support. Is it because the rules are centered around kids? Yea I'd like the same rules applied to my demographic, but this seems like a good step forward.
- SuperNinKenDo 3y agoI don't understand either. I'd be happy for somebody to comment and point out something I've missed. But voting and flagging seems to pass for productive discourse here these days.
- adestefan 3y agoIt's the techno-liberatarian wing of HN that flares up on issues like this.