i have a straightforward principle for using the Web and serving a part of it: both parties have the right to serve and consume the content as they choose to.

i have a straightforward principle for using the Web and serving a part of it: both parties have the right to serve and consume the content as they choose to. all this shaming by content owners who tend to continue pushing more intrusive ads is being rather unfair. at the same time, i don't see any issues with them witholding access to content if we try to bypass their intended use. today serving content at a reasonable level has never been this cheap. if you serve a 2MB webpage for 500 word piece, then it serves you right when you complain about how much it costs you to run it. using that argument to moral policing only goes so far.