3 ms·

Taking a look at a paper I have that went up this month and another that went up before the dec cutoff on ar5iv, they look 90% OK! Figures with side-by-side plo

Taking a look at a paper I have that went up this month and another that went up before the dec cutoff on ar5iv, they look 90% OK! Figures with side-by-side plots and algorithm environments are the common culprit for being broken though. Particularly in figures, it seems like the width argument isn't being interpreted correctly. Interestingly this review paper seems to have their side by side figures intact (e.g. fig 2 fig 4). Maybe it's because he used a subfigure like environment (judging by the subcaptions)? https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1609.04747 https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1609.04747

dginev 3y ago
For the image widths, there is some CSS fine-tuning that is still needed on the arXiv HTML side. I think that will get fixed soon, just needs the right height directive set. Getting subfigures emulated via flexbox is one of our more recent LaTeXML enhancements, and still has some ongoing work (working on it today actually). It can be a bit finicky to test - there are easily 20 different ways people can write LaTeX for subfigures in arXiv.