Got it, thanks for looking into it more closely. I didn't actually finish reading the paper, and missed that this was in section 3: "Subsequent fine-tuning was

Got it, thanks for looking into it more closely. I didn't actually finish reading the paper, and missed that this was in section 3: "Subsequent fine-tuning was conducted on the MOSS finetune dataset [36], which is tailored for dialogue systems." Agreed this almost certainly isn't faked, but the validity of using this dataset at all seems questionable.