I just tested saving https://browse.arxiv.org/html/2312.12451v1 https://browse.arxiv.org/html/2312.12451v1 to disk using Chrome, transferring it to my Android p

I just tested saving https://browse.arxiv.org/html/2312.12451v1 https://browse.arxiv.org/html/2312.12451v1 to disk using Chrome, transferring it to my Android phone, and opening it on the phone. Results: 1. Saving as "Webpage, Single File" (.mhtml): Neither Firefox nor Chrome even showed up in the list of available apps to open it. 2. Saving as "Webpage, Complete": Opened in Chrome but images were broken. Also very difficult to open with the default file browser because it uses a flat folder view and the sidecar folder pollutes the file list. I was hoping this would work, perhaps you will have different findings. I agree that HTML is the superior format in theory but usability in practice is often lacking. I'm resigned to using both depending on context.