5 ms·

A lot of Lodash functions are implemented as combinations of other Lodash functions, so importing a single function actually imports half of Lodash under the ho

• baq 3y ago
  Would it be shorter if it didn’t, though?
  • addandsubtract 3y ago
    The expectation is that you import the whole library and not just one function. At which point, lodash is smaller than if each function was implemented separately.
  • qayxc 3y ago
    Glimpsing at the source code - yes, definitely. For example, the code imports "copyArray", a 9LoC function that does exactly the same as the built-in Array.slice() would do. Same goes for other imported helpers like "arrayEach", which could be replaced by the built-in Array.every(). It's basically a bunch of unnecessary polyfills for built-ins.
    • mishac 3y ago
      Unnecessary _now_ perhaps, but not unnecessary when lodash was written. In 2009, when underscore.js came out (from which lodash was a fork) Array.every() was not something you could rely on. Chrome just came out a year earlier (and didn't support Array.every until version 4) and half the world was on IE 6-7-8