We can get @dang (or another moderator) to change this to point to the Reuter's article, which would be my preference. (I also hate it when a lazy website just

We can get @dang (or another moderator) to change this to point to the Reuter's article, which would be my preference. (I also hate it when a lazy website just copy/pastes from another website who did all the work). But that being said: the facts on the ground seem to be solid. We can discuss the Reuter's article instead and try to elevate the discussion here.