3 ms·
> Business Insider clearly states they are drawing from a Reuters investigation story So blogspam without adding anything or checking authenticity is great rep
by belltaco 3y ago
> Business Insider clearly states they are drawing from a Reuters investigation story
So blogspam without adding anything or checking authenticity is great reporting now?
- defrost 3y agoWhich part of my comment led you to paraphrase it as you did?
- belltaco 3y agoThis part: > If you want to take issue with what you see as "poor reporting" then take issue with the source: Reporting from a source means you take responsibility for it. If a publication keeps reposting poor reporting as fact while posting sources, it's a bad publication, and people should definitely take issue with it. It doesn't absolve BI if Reuters is doing poor reporting. Not to mention a publication just reposting content from another source without fact checking of their own is just content-stealing blogspam with clickbait titles.