3 ms·
Your assertions have two potentials flaws. 1. You assume that giving a certain race a favorable edge is unfair. If the premise of DEI is correct, that the fiel
by Hnrobert42 3y ago
Your assertions have two potentials flaws.
1. You assume that giving a certain race a favorable edge is unfair. If the premise of DEI is correct, that the field is tilted against certain races, then having a preference for those races is leveling the playing field, not tilting it in their favor.
2. Perhaps hiring a no-hire was exactly the right thing to do. Perhaps the interviewers were prejudiced against the candidate for reasons other than merit. Of course, I don’t know the exact situation, so I said “potential” flaws.