3 ms·

LA Fitness won't stand a chance in a court. You'd show the judge a email demanding to cancel the subscription, and LAF will show a scammy "terms of service" imp

by akomtu 3y ago

LA Fitness won't stand a chance in a court. You'd show the judge a email demanding to cancel the subscription, and LAF will show a scammy "terms of service" implying you can't easily cancel. That's why scammy companies like this want binding arbitration and try to avoid any real scrutiny.

xg15 3y ago
I'm absolutely with you that their games around cancelling are beyond shitty and hopefully illegal - but my point was that those are two orthogonal legal matters and it's not a good idea to start playing games of your own if you suspect the other to do so. In this case, your argument was that you never had a contract with them in the first place. But this would be hard to believe if you actually used their services. Your cancellation email would undermine this argument even more, as you don't request cancellation if you don't have a contract. So a court could perfectly well decide that the gym acted in breach of the law by making it deliberately hard to cancel, but that you acted in breach of the law too by stopping payment without even trying to cancel. If you argue that you made your best effort to cancel, as documented by the email, that would be a more convincing argument I think (not a lawyer tho) but that's a different argument than claiming there never was a contract at all.
- akomtu 3y ago
  My email would say that I'm no longer visiting the gym and they must stop charging my card, and to avoid confusion, I'm stopping the payments on my end. I actually did exactly this many years ago with another sleazy gym, and it worked. Obviously, nowhere in the communications with the gym I'd acknowledge there is any contract. It's no different than going to a grocery store: just because I've been using it for years doesn't mean there's any contract, even if the grocery stores believes so.

3 ms·

LA Fitness won't stand a chance in a court. You'd show the judge a email demanding to cancel the subscription, and LAF will show a scammy "terms of service" imp

by akomtu 3y ago

xg15 3y ago
I'm absolutely with you that their games around cancelling are beyond shitty and hopefully illegal - but my point was that those are two orthogonal legal matters and it's not a good idea to start playing games of your own if you suspect the other to do so. In this case, your argument was that you never had a contract with them in the first place. But this would be hard to believe if you actually used their services. Your cancellation email would undermine this argument even more, as you don't request cancellation if you don't have a contract. So a court could perfectly well decide that the gym acted in breach of the law by making it deliberately hard to cancel, but that you acted in breach of the law too by stopping payment without even trying to cancel. If you argue that you made your best effort to cancel, as documented by the email, that would be a more convincing argument I think (not a lawyer tho) but that's a different argument than claiming there never was a contract at all.
- akomtu 3y ago
  My email would say that I'm no longer visiting the gym and they must stop charging my card, and to avoid confusion, I'm stopping the payments on my end. I actually did exactly this many years ago with another sleazy gym, and it worked. Obviously, nowhere in the communications with the gym I'd acknowledge there is any contract. It's no different than going to a grocery store: just because I've been using it for years doesn't mean there's any contract, even if the grocery stores believes so.