3 ms·
I wish to live the day where we can incentivize one ecosystem without having to trash another. This is not a zero-sum game. If you find Wasmer useful, use it!
by syrusakbary 3y ago
I wish to live the day where we can incentivize one ecosystem without having to trash another.
This is not a zero-sum game.
If you find Wasmer useful, use it! If you don’t and you prefer others, feel free to use them. There are plenty of choices.
Happy holidays!
- theplatman 3y agoI would say that this landing page on your company’s website is unnecessarily trashing wasmtime in the headline https://wasmer.io/wasmer-vs-wasmtime https://wasmer.io/wasmer-vs-wasmtime
- k__ 3y agoPreaching water, drinking wine. Classic.
- syrusakbary 3y agoNo intend of trashing (in marketing pages titles tend to be more flashy). In any case I just updated it. Happy holidays!
- aleksiy123 3y agoIs it just me or is it weird to show a faster startup speed as a bigger bar? I thought it was slower until I saw the 1000x. Even 1000x seems kinda meaningless.
- throwawaysugar 3y agoNone of those are actual answers to the criticism posted by the parent, so it's hard to really care even if it's wrapped around a loving tone. Happy holidays to you as well!
- syrusakbary 3y agoThanks! I sometimes assume people have the same context as I do, and your comment made me realize that it was not the case. Here's some context: https://wasmer.io/posts/wasmer-and-trademarks https://wasmer.io/posts/wasmer-and-trademarks Regarding standards, I assume the mention is referring to Wasmer push for WASIX [1]. Which is a specification & implementation that welcomes anyone to participate (even on it's governance model), so I don't think the stance of the previous comment is accurate. [1] https://wasix.org/ https://wasix.org/