3 ms·
Because it's a way worse experience than taking my own car. Maybe if they paid me I'd take it. If they paid enough.
by talldatethrow 3y ago
Because it's a way worse experience than taking my own car. Maybe if they paid me I'd take it. If they paid enough.
- ryukafalz 3y agoAs someone living in the Northeast and having often made train trips of similar length (Philadelphia -> Boston), I don't see how. If I'm driving and need to stop to use the bathroom, eat something, or so on I'm setting myself back time-wise. Plus I have to stay sitting down the whole time and have to stay focused on the road for hours. If I take the train, I can get up, stretch my legs, grab some food, and I'll still get there at exactly the same time I would have otherwise. I can watch a movie on the way, or pull out my laptop to work on a side project if I want, or play some video games. I'll take the train over driving any day.
- talldatethrow 3y agoI suppose all this hinges on if you want to have a car when you get to the destination. If not, then sure take the train if flying doesn't work. But I usually want to have a car. So I'll be driving until it really doesn't make sense for me. Most people I know spend crazy money for a car, if you compare to how little they could spend. Thus it seems many people are ok shelling out thousands of dollars a year for a cooler or more comfortable car. I have a feeling if high speed rail costs the same as taking their car, they are for sure going to take their car.
- bluGill 3y agoIn short we need better local transit