3 ms·
Oh, I agree. $1,200 monitors are mostly better than $300 ones. A more interesting comparison here IMHO is with panels using the same technology, sold around th
by guilamu 3y ago
Oh, I agree. $1,200 monitors are mostly better than $300 ones.
A more interesting comparison here IMHO is with panels using the same technology, sold around the same price (IPS or VA) and lacking Mini-LEDs backlighting.
Rtings seems to conclude that Mini-LEDs backlighting is far better than full panel back lighting.
Hell, I'm using one right now (KTC M27T20, paid 330 euros) and it's just amazingly good... even if not as good as OLED.
Also, right now, OLED also suffer from text fringing issues : https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1682676702 https://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=...
- moneywoes 3y agoburn in as well no?
- guilamu 3y agoYeah, also, but to be fair, I've got a 6 years old OLED phone without any burn-in, and a 3 years old OLED laptop without any burn-in. So, I don't know, I guess unless you purposely display a static white element for hours every day for years, you won't live to see a burn-in on an OLED display.