The subtext of your argument is that you think you can legislate away human behavior. There is a cheap process to make meth, and there’s another process that i

The subtext of your argument is that you think you can legislate away human behavior. There is a cheap process to make meth, and there’s another process that involves Sudafed. Banning Sudafed does not stop meth production. But here you are still supporting a ban on Sudafed - because of what some theoretical person might do with it ignoring that they’re doing it now without it. I don’t believe this is a logical failure, I believe whatever culture you grew up in imparted this way of thinking.