4 ms·
However, there is every chance that circumventing a service's security controls is a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
by GeekyBear 3y ago
However, there is every chance that circumventing a service's security controls is a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.
- rootusrootus 3y agoThat's something I've been wondering about myself. People have run afoul of the CFAA with less egregious actions than these. I guess the Beeper guys talked to their lawyer at least, before taking this course of action.
- smashah 3y agoThis type of project is protected from CFAA by Van Buren. AFAIK the only untested precedent is ToS violation.