> The 'source' in this is the "House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack". It's hard to get more authoritative.. "Authoritative" is an interesting term...

> The 'source' in this is the "House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack". It's hard to get more authoritative.. "Authoritative" is an interesting term...does it imply (and guarantee) accuracy of claims? > Accepting the government investigation reports, the fake elector plot was real. To what degree was it "real"? And does "real" mean "objectively true"? > demanding that you respond to some made-up conspiracy Row, row, row your boat...