3 ms·
That seems plausible, but speed is probably an important requirement. Bowling alleys often charge by the hour, so who wants to go to a bowling alley with slow m
by adrianmonk 3y ago
That seems plausible, but speed is probably an important requirement. Bowling alleys often charge by the hour, so who wants to go to a bowling alley with slow machines?
The traditional pinsetter machine can sweep away pins in one operation, then set up all the right pins in one more operation. A robot arm can presumably only grab one pin at a time. You probably need multiple robot arms, which adds to the cost.
- duderific 3y agoYep, not to mention the space requirements. It's hard to imagine fitting several robot arms plus any associated machinery into the relatively limited space at the end of a bowling lane.
- adrianmonk 3y agoHmm, maybe a hybrid approach would work. The traditional pinsetter has 10 pins ready to go in a holder that lowers them all down from above. That part seems simple enough. The complex part is creating order out of chaos and loading pins into that holder. Suppose you keep that holder, and then do this: (1) After the ball comes through, take note of which pins are standing, then immediately sweep them ALL away into an area back behind. (2) The holder, which already has 10 pins in it, lowers and releases 1-10 pins as appropriate. (3) While the bowler is taking their next shot, the robot arm works on picking up pins from the back area and refilling the holder. This way, the robot arm can work in parallel with the bowler taking their next shot. If the bowler is really fast, the robot might still not be able to keep up, but at least it doesn't have to do all its work super quick in a narrow window of time.