3 ms·
Well both would be worrying, maybe one less than the other. Really I'd rather have a safe car where the failure modes are not stupid, so I can stop worrying alt
by dataflow 3y ago
Well both would be worrying, maybe one less than the other. Really I'd rather have a safe car where the failure modes are not stupid, so I can stop worrying altogether.
- solveit 3y agoSure, but the failure modes of the traditional human-controlled car are incredibly stupid, we've just gotten used to it.
- dataflow 3y ago> the failure modes of the traditional human-controlled car are incredibly stupid, we've just gotten used to it. This is missing the point. Just because we accommodate certain types of errors by humans, that doesn't mean should or would tolerate them if the same errors were made by machines. (Or vice-versa, for that matter.) The standards we hold machines and humans to can be very different, and that should be expected.