> > What problem was Kubernetes trying to solve? How did the solution address the problem? What problem was Agile trying to solve? How did the solution address

> > What problem was Kubernetes trying to solve? How did the solution address the problem? What problem was Agile trying to solve? How did the solution address the problem? It’s only by examining these questions can an organization make the solution their own. > But then doesn't go onto to actually examine or explore these questions in the blogpost, just moves on and ignores those questions after bringing them up. Isn't that the point of the article? He is not trying to demonstrate to the audience "This is the problem Agile was intended to solve. This is how it addressed that problem.", he is pointing out that Agile is deployed as a solution without ever considering the problem that that solution was supposed to address. The blog post, to me, seemed to be proposing a refinement of the problem before a solution is proposed. Pointing out that many solutions are proposed before a problem statement is posed is the entire point of the blog post, not answering the questions he asks about commonly deployed solutions.