> Quantum logic May be sufficient to describe all of the actual relations Cirq docs > Named Topologies > LineTopology, TiltedSquareLattice https://quantumai.

> Quantum logic May be sufficient to describe all of the actual relations Cirq docs > Named Topologies > LineTopology, TiltedSquareLattice https://quantumai.google/cirq/named_topologies https://quantumai.google/cirq/named_topologies QISkit Lattice models > LineLattice, SquareLattice, HyperCubicLattice, TriangularLattice: https://qiskit.org/ecosystem/nature/tutorials/10_lattice_models.html https://qiskit.org/ecosystem/nature/tutorials/10_lattice_mod... But how do we do CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) with QC with quantum logical decomposition with comparatively tiny lattices with current mortal quantum computers? Given that the known degrees of complexity in fluid problems with rotation and expansion - like Godel logic's Fluid solutions to GR - exceed the available topologies and counts EC error corrected qubits? How complex could the relations between arbitrary things be, given terminology of Quantum discord; nonlocal entanglement and non-entanglement relations and Occam's Razor and fluids without emergence?