12 ms·
It says in the article that its 653,000, not 40 million. Not really sure where you are getting that figure, however it appears that the actual number is under a
by no_wizard 3y ago
It says in the article that its 653,000, not 40 million. Not really sure where you are getting that figure, however it appears that the actual number is under a million people
- wenebego 3y agoThey used 331.9 million * .12 not realizing it was a rate of change rather than a percentage of the population