4 ms·
If I understood correctly. Ruling doesn't concern with who is the actual "inventor", just that the ownership must be with a person or Corporation. So, you are f
by blackoil 3y ago
If I understood correctly. Ruling doesn't concern with who is the actual "inventor", just that the ownership must be with a person or Corporation. So, you are free to file patents under your name that have been created by your AI. Which makes sense as AI isn't legally an autonomous entity.
- singularity2001 3y agoAI isn't legally an autonomous entity (... yet?)
- krapp 3y agoI see no reason why AI would ever be allowed legal autonomy or identity. That would] be counterproductive to the purpose of using AI to generate and capture value.