2 ms·
Was it a loss? I don't think so. It was either ineffective, stale or a massive privacy issue. We're better off with local caches.
by Avamander 3y ago
Was it a loss? I don't think so. It was either ineffective, stale or a massive privacy issue. We're better off with local caches.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- verisimi 3y agoThe zip images? It meant that less data was being sent. Same with the cache. The worst of it was that internet providers wanted to tamper with data, and insert this or that advert into what they sent. The absence of that is a good thing.