3 ms·
>the lack of propellant The molybdenum rod IS the propellant. It eventually ends up out in space. I'm only aware of one propellantless thruster, and I'm waiti
by mikewarot 3y ago
>the lack of propellant
The molybdenum rod IS the propellant. It eventually ends up out in space.
I'm only aware of one propellantless thruster, and I'm waiting to see if it works aboard Barry-1[1] It uses electric power in an entirely closed drive, generating 1 milli-newton of thrust. It should be switched on in a month or two.
[1] https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/graph-orbit-data.php?CATNR=58338 https://celestrak.org/NORAD/elements/graph-orbit-data.php?CA...
- throwawaymaths 3y agoDo you have citation on that it's gonna be switched on in a month? Have been curious about this
- boznz 3y agoI am aware of zero propellant less drives. My Prescence on the internet and news sites is not what it used to be but I'm sure I wouldn't have missed Newtons laws being upended.