2 ms·
Why is there nothing about how it obtained the documents or how it verified the authenticity? Also why no comparison against other carmakers? A well respected m
by belltaco 3y ago
Why is there nothing about how it obtained the documents or how it verified the authenticity? Also why no comparison against other carmakers? A well respected media outlet would that. Instead it adds some weird things totally out of place.
> Neither Musk nor any of his companies commented for these reports. But he recently lashed out at critics of his social-media company, X, formerly Twitter, which has seen its revenue and market value plummet since Musk bought the firm for $44 billion about a year ago. At the live Times event, he went after advertisers who boycotted X over Musk’s endorsement of an antisemitic post on the social-media site. “Go fuck yourself,” the billionaire told companies who pulled their business.
How does the second sentence follow from the first? They don't seem related but the second sentence starts with "But he..". Terrible writing.
- acdha 3y agoLook, I get that you have an emotional connection to this company’s image but it’s important to try to think rationally about it. Ask what’s more likely: Reuters not verifying the source of the documents and the people they interviewed so they could run a hit piece on a famously litigious man’s company, or that they did follow standard journalistic practices and it turns out that all of the things you’ve read online about quality control issues are actually representative?