9 ms·
Can't argue with that! :-) For what it's worth, you can keep both, and make parallel vs sequential execution an option, with a boolean flag. You can also leav
by cs702 3y ago
Can't argue with that! :-)
For what it's worth, you can keep both, and make parallel vs sequential execution an option, with a boolean flag.
You can also leave the sequential code as a comment explaining what the parallel code does.
Or, if slow execution doesn't bother you, leave it as is.
- bradfitz 3y agoYou're replying to somebody who was arguing for readability being its virtue and you're proposing ... adding options and alternate code paths? :)
- anytime5704 3y agoVia a boolean parameter, no less.
- cs702 3y agoTouché. I just updated my comment :-)