6 ms·
Agreed. Also, "just got a lot weaker" is misleading, as the vulnerability already existed, it was just discovered. "was weaker than we thought" is a bit less ex
by ssgodderidge 3y ago
Agreed. Also, "just got a lot weaker" is misleading, as the vulnerability already existed, it was just discovered. "was weaker than we thought" is a bit less exciting, but more accurate.
- abtinf 3y agoThe headline is the opposite of the truth: it is now stronger than ever. By the logic of a headline, a person cured of a disease is weaker afterward.
- pas 3y agogoing through a long sickness usually leaves one weaker afterward, even if one is cured, no? and in some cases there might be a slight upside in acquiring a certain degree of protection from future illnesses from that disease through various immunity mechanisms (which are of course far from perfect).
- Filligree 3y agoOkay, yes, that's one way the analogy breaks down.
- eslaught 3y agoIt's more like you always had a disease and just didn't know it. Celiac comes to mind as a common example. I know people who improved a lot once they got diagnosed, and just never realized the symptoms meant anything before that.
- pas 3y agoyep, but that's not curable (yet!)
- commandersaki 3y agoAlso while the attack is novel it is hard to launch in practice (requires MITM) and even if you manage to pull that off, there isn't much to be gained (even with the downgrade for authenticated data to use SHA1 as it isn't practical to attack an interactive session).