The article notes that the images were parsed from the Commom Crawl dataset, so perhaps the outrage should be directed there? After all, it's a scrape of the In

The article notes that the images were parsed from the Commom Crawl dataset, so perhaps the outrage should be directed there? After all, it's a scrape of the Internet, and includes some pages with CSAM images on them... How's this fundamentally different than Google (or any other search engine) indexing a site that contains CSAM? It's not technically feasible to filter every image on every indexed page during crawl time, especially if it requires uploading every image to PhotoDNA. The service would simply break under the load.