3 ms·
It's in a paragraph about false-positive matches, so FTC is saying the data was likely wrong. The complaint has more specific details: > a. In numerous instan
by eesmith 3y ago
It's in a paragraph about false-positive matches, so FTC is saying the data was likely wrong.
The complaint has more specific details:
> a. In numerous instances, Rite Aid’s facial recognition technology generated
match alerts that were likely false positives because they occurred in
stores that were geographically distant from the store that created the
relevant enrollment. For example, between December 2019 and July
2020, Rite Aid’s facial recognition technology generated over 5,000 match
alerts in stores that were more than 100 miles from the store that created
the relevant enrollment. ...
> b. Some enrollments generated high numbers of match alerts in locations
throughout the United States. For instance, during a five-day period, Rite
Aid’s facial recognition technology generated over 900 match alerts for a
single enrollment. The match alerts occurred in over 130 different Rite
Aid stores (a majority of all locations using facial recognition technology),
including hundreds of alerts each in New York and Los Angeles, over 100
alerts in Philadelphia, and additional alerts in Baltimore; Detroit;
Sacramento; Delaware; Seattle; Manchester, New Hampshire; and
Norfolk, Virginia. In multiple instances, Rite Aid employees took action,
including asking consumers to leave stores, based on matches to this
enrollment.
> c. Between December 2019 and July 2020, Rite Aid’s facial recognition
technology generated over 2,000 match alerts that occurred within a short
time of one or more other match alerts to the same enrollment in
geographically distant locations within a short period of time, such that it
was impossible or implausible that the same individual could have caused
the alerts in the different locations. For example, for a particular
enrollment image that was originally captured at a Los Angeles store, Rite
Aid’s facial recognition technology generated over 30 match alerts in New
York City and Philadelphia between February 2020 and July 2020. Each of
the New York and Philadelphia matches occurred within 24 hours of a
match alert in a California store and thus was likely a false positive.