4 ms·

I disagree with you that “Hardware goes out of date” is, in fact, a solvable problem. The truth is, macroscopic writing, in the sense of scratching or applying

I disagree with you that “Hardware goes out of date” is, in fact, a solvable problem. The truth is, macroscopic writing, in the sense of scratching or applying pigment / dye to a surface, is a very old technology, and we know very well what the revealed points of weakness are, and in many cases, how to avoid these points of weakness. Perhaps most importantly, a minimally-trained individual can recognize the content and potentially the importance of a physical document. This is not the case with modern technologies that require a separate apparatus to be decoded and displayed. In many cases, this apparatus is not available, and it is possible that the layperson will not recognize the reel, cartridge, cassette, slide, disc, drive, wax cylinder, etc, for what it is and simply discard it. This is by far the greatest risk for data preservation.

MagicMoonlight 3y ago
If we reach a point where people working in the archive don’t know what a computer is, we’re at the point where we don’t need to know what Dave’s will had in it. Think about what you are protecting here. Dave’s will. Ol’ davo from down pub. Literally meaningless beyond the potential for mild curiosity in a hundred years. If the worst happened and we lose them, it’s insignificant. Planning for the preservation of davo’s will in the event of an apocalypse is a waste of our time.
- alasarmas 3y ago
  What if that is not Dave’s will, but Dave’s first novel? Or the technical manual to Dave’s computer system, where the onboard help files are just a URL that points to a dead server? Knowledge preservation in the face of disaster is not a pointless effort. Further, there is a difference between “knowing what a computer is” and “recognizing a specific manifestation of computing technology”. For example, this picture [0]. The URL is somewhat descriptive, but say you were presented with that piece of technology. Would you recognize it? Would you think that it could be important? Would you be able to get it running? For me, personally, it would be a significant effort in terms of time spent… and I certainly wouldn’t be able to recognize it just from that picture. 0. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/ZIP_Drive_100%2C_5.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/ZIP_Driv...

MagicMoonlight 3y ago

If we reach a point where people working in the archive don’t know what a computer is, we’re at the point where we don’t need to know what Dave’s will had in it. Think about what you are protecting here. Dave’s will. Ol’ davo from down pub. Literally meaningless beyond the potential for mild curiosity in a hundred years. If the worst happened and we lose them, it’s insignificant. Planning for the preservation of davo’s will in the event of an apocalypse is a waste of our time.

alasarmas 3y ago
What if that is not Dave’s will, but Dave’s first novel? Or the technical manual to Dave’s computer system, where the onboard help files are just a URL that points to a dead server? Knowledge preservation in the face of disaster is not a pointless effort. Further, there is a difference between “knowing what a computer is” and “recognizing a specific manifestation of computing technology”. For example, this picture [0]. The URL is somewhat descriptive, but say you were presented with that piece of technology. Would you recognize it? Would you think that it could be important? Would you be able to get it running? For me, personally, it would be a significant effort in terms of time spent… and I certainly wouldn’t be able to recognize it just from that picture. 0. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/ZIP_Drive_100%2C_5.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/ZIP_Driv...