3 ms·
agree in principle, but i will split some hairs here. if you type "ls" into your local terminal, there's an implicit agreement that it will run the remote "ls"
by sawka 3y ago
agree in principle, but i will split some hairs here. if you type "ls" into your local terminal, there's an implicit agreement that it will run the remote "ls" program. the helper program facilitates that in the same way that any other terminal + ssh + shell combo does. it only runs commands in response to your activities in the terminal.
- karmakaze 3y agoOh so we're holding it wrong. Does 'modern' mean pre-enshittified?
- binary132 3y agoyes if ls is installed on the remote host and if it is not, the command should fail this appears to be about telemetry, pure and simple
- sawka 3y agoabsolutely no telemetry in the helper, full stop. you can inspect the code yourself. we do hear the feedback though and are working on a popup/notification that will prompt you before we push the helper program for the next release.
- binary132 3y agoDoes it, or will it ever fetch waveshell over the network on demand?
- omnimus 3y agoso youve been linux user for 25 years but dont see a problem here huh?