4 ms·
The results look very impressive. The prompting however, is a bit weird - there's suspiciously many samples with an "8k"-suffix, presumably to get more photorea
by qayxc 3y ago
The results look very impressive. The prompting however, is a bit weird - there's suspiciously many samples with an "8k"-suffix, presumably to get more photorealistic results? I really don't like that kind of stuff, when prompting becomes more like reciting sacred incantations instead of actual descriptions of what you want.
- ronsor 3y agoPrompting has always been an esoteric technological spell full of "unreal engine 5" and "8k uhd cinematic"
- zoklet-enjoyer 3y agoHyper realistic. Kodak candid shot. Kodachrome. Stomach ache. Grotesque. Smoked meats
- benjijay 3y agoLarge fries, chocolate shake?
- 3abiton 3y agoComing from SD prompting, you quickly get used to tons of different terms to maximize the quality of your output, and not straightfoward to know which one is a signal and which is a noise. It all depends on the training data.
- minimaxir 3y ago"8k HD" was a prompt engineering trick from the VQGAN + CLIP and Stable Diffusion 1.X era, since they did indeed have an impact in getting photorealism as CLIP's text encoder is funny like that. When Stable Diffusion 2.X was released with a new text encoder, it broke all these tricks and people were upset. Here's a fun demo of the impact of prompt engineering tricks back in the VQGAN + CLIP days: https://imgur.com/a/SnSIQRu https://imgur.com/a/SnSIQRu Odd to see the same trick work on a completely new text encoder though.
- yieldcrv 3y agoyou dont have to do that stuff, you just start doing it because someone else got a better result than you also it is very easy for software to concatenate strings for you behind the scenes before sending it to the model
- mobiuscog 3y ago> you dont have to do that stuff, you just start doing it because someone else got a better result than you This is the point where humans possibly 'hallucinate' ;)