3 ms·
I think it's less the decision-maker and more the ring that's built around the decision-maker. It's also true in my experience that decision-makers are often p
by gen220 3y ago
I think it's less the decision-maker and more the ring that's built around the decision-maker.
It's also true in my experience that decision-makers are often pretty solid. Decision-making is its own craft, many CEO/VP-type people take that craft very seriously.
But, unless the person in question has spent a significant amount of time and effort in forming their own "society", the "default" rings that accrete around these people are pretty awful.
Agreed that the bad apples are more frequently sampled in the media, and it distorts perception of the overall population. But I do think it's the default state of human nature for great power to (eventually) attract great grift and lose its raison d'être – you see it all over history.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoThe 'ring that's built around the decision-maker' is still, on average, better than the median person. But it generally is very unevenly distributed in any single, concrete, individual, so that it may appear to be worse depending on perspective. e.g. A bonafide super-genius with a lot of unfortunate personality traits. Such that they can't really be considered that great, just somewhat above average.