4 ms·
So do I, but that's more of the reason to keep things robust, no? In my work projects, I can use the dangerous code like this - because we have compilers and l
by theamk 3y ago
So do I, but that's more of the reason to keep things robust, no?
In my work projects, I can use the dangerous code like this - because we have compilers and libraries frozen, unit and integration tests, a complex testing process. We can do all the right efforts to ensure the things work, even if solution is intrinsically unreliable.
In my personal projects I write some stuff and start using it, the testing is minimal, and toolchain versions is "whatever platformio decided to pull up today". I'd hate for my project to break just because I rebuilt it to add the new feature and meanwhile my compiler got upgraded. So I'd definitely abuse SPI port or something to get things reliable.