4 ms·
Considering it was only a WINE version that was little-used, I think it makes sense. (Same with the Mac version...if you're using Picasaweb to host your photos
by rkudeshi 15y ago
Considering it was only a WINE version that was little-used, I think it makes sense.
(Same with the Mac version...if you're using Picasaweb to host your photos, you're probably already, or would be better off, using Picasa to organize them instead of kludging a plugin into iPhoto.)
- luser001 15y agoMaking a Wine version instead of the real thing was also lame. I would have guessed that at least a few Googlers would be using Linux on their primary computers.
- ekianjo 15y agoits a call to stop using google services altogether. I am personnally sick of their now frequent habit to discontinue stuff without even asking before. That shows how little they care. Get LARRY out.
- ticks 15y agoPicasa is more than just a web service, it's great for fixing images (with minimal effort) and searching local collections of photos via face recognition.
- donniezazen 15y agoI agree Picasa for Linux (Wine or No Wine) was great for some quick picture manipulation. I was well connected to Picasa Web. Picasa is being slipped into G+. I suspect Google might be working on a better webapp. A lot of picasa style picture editing can now be done in G+ while you post picture. Google has to bring something out for Chrome OS.
- rhizome 15y agoA lot of picasa style picture editing can now be done in G+ while you post picture. What about pictures that won't get posted?
- donniezazen 15y agoWell, what I mean is that it might be work in progress.