> none of the above, exactly as the Schrödinger equation we spoke earlier, require the time to be something internal, something that is required for the univer

> none of the above, exactly as the Schrödinger equation we spoke earlier, require the time to be something internal, something that is required for the universe to tick. Isn't it somewhat ironic to say so, because without time, how could the universe, or anything, "tick"? > this does not verify that time exists as a fundamental entity of the universe. What kind of proof would it take for you to say that time is a fundamental entity? In other words what do you mean by "fundamental entity"?