4 ms·

I don't care for Wayland because I don't care for the FreeDesktop people, Red Hat or IBM. It's also horribly bloated, x.org runs comfortably on very very little

I don't care for Wayland because I don't care for the FreeDesktop people, Red Hat or IBM. It's also horribly bloated, x.org runs comfortably on very very little hardware, Wayland is an incredible resource hog by comparison. I hope soon, the FreeDesktop people will formally stop "supporting" X.org so some other, more interested party can finally take control. FreeDesktop's charter promises that they will extend X.org, not abandon it OR replace it, so if you've given donations to them (as my organization has) you should feel a little ripped off.

hq1 3y ago
> x.org runs comfortably on very very little hardware, Wayland is an incredible resource hog by comparison. Citation needed.
- LanzVonL 3y ago
  Nope, no citation needed. It's just the truth.
  - orangeboats 3y ago
    I got 1~2 hours of additional battery life on Wayland. Unless we have a very different definition of "truth" or "an incredible resource hog", then indeed citation is needed. Since you are the first in this comment chain to assert that Wayland is bloated, perhaps you should also be the first to provide evidences to support your assertion too.
    - LanzVonL 3y ago
      >I got 1~2 hours of additional battery life on Wayland. Proof needed.