> I have in the past suggested that the fact that the MDC has remained unbroken for 20+ years is evidence that it is secure. This seems like... not a great sta

> I have in the past suggested that the fact that the MDC has remained unbroken for 20+ years is evidence that it is secure. This seems like... not a great stance to take on post about a vulnerability that existed for 20+ years. I don't understand the defensiveness.