Well, let's agree to disagree about versatility: I don't see non-specialized AI outperforming humans in a number of years (a human will easily beat chess AI at

Well, let's agree to disagree about versatility: I don't see non-specialized AI outperforming humans in a number of years (a human will easily beat chess AI at Go). While I am somewhat impressed by the conversational acumen of recent LLMs, the fact they can produce outright garbage tells me we are as far away from synthesising multiple types of intelligences as ever: humans simply need far smaller input data set to start recognizing patterns and rules (as witnessed by kids learning to speak). I am not yet convinced we'll live to see something like actual self-driving cars with as much capability as an average human driver: I believe augmented environments are needed (communicating roads, signals and cars) to get to self-driving cars. The one thing they've got going for them is consistent focus, whereas practical ability in humans significantly depends on the mood, tiredness, level of multitasking...