4 ms·
I have tried it, and I feel like this is not a good toolkit for desktop apps. It's great for embedded hardware with custom interfaces such as vending machines,
by vilunov 3y ago
I have tried it, and I feel like this is not a good toolkit for desktop apps. It's great for embedded hardware with custom interfaces such as vending machines, car on-board PCs, screens in public transport, but it does not have that native look-n-feel on desktop, at least not out of the box.
- ComputerGuru 3y agoDidn’t they migrate to Fluent UI style or am I mistaking them for someone else?
- madnirua 3y agoYou are right. The Qt backend is optional.
- saidinesh5 3y agoI thought slint supports a Qt backend for desktop apps: https://slint.dev/releases/1.3.2/docs/slint/src/advanced/backends_and_renderers https://slint.dev/releases/1.3.2/docs/slint/src/advanced/bac... ? But yeah I've had same issues when using QtQuick for desktop use cases.