5 ms·
This sounds like a made-up concern to me or am I missing something? "One Fortune 500 executive recently told me that they were worried that one organization co
by schalkneethling 3y ago
This sounds like a made-up concern to me or am I missing something?
"One Fortune 500 executive recently told me that they were worried that one organization could use a public LLM to learn what its competitors were asking that same LLM. For example, one pharmaceutical company using ChatGPT4 or similar for corporate espionage could essentially spy on its competitor’s research queries. A public LLM aggregates the data of the prompt itself and which user initiated that prompt. So, by asking about a certain company’s research, that data can become part of the public record."
- I_Am_Nous 3y agoAs I understand it, the public LLMs don't have a "memory" they can access, even if they hallucinate that they do. At a higher layer, a hacker might be able to access the prompt history in the boring, old fashioned stolen/hacked credentials way, but in no way would I consider an LLM telling me what Bayer queried to be accurate information.