>> People will always be creative. > Just not in the fields where AI will replace them? ... if the music in our culture end ups being dominated by AI musak. W

>> People will always be creative. > Just not in the fields where AI will replace them? ... if the music in our culture end ups being dominated by AI musak. Will AI dominate music? Probably. Is there anything that can be done to stop that? No. Even if you outlawed it in the US it won't stop it. It's coming and there is nothing that can be done. If that is a good or bad thing IDK. Most modern music is so awful that to me this doesn't matter anyway. > but because it does crap illustrations cheaper The work it outputs is astounding, if it was crap no one would want to use it. >>Humans will still continue to be creative and draw and paint. That won't change. >No, just the ability to make a living out of it, as opposed to getting a drab office or factory job will. AI is coming for factor and office jobs too. But yes this will cut the ability to make money on it. > Who exactly did sign up for that, and who said this is "forward" and not following it's "holding back"? It doesn't matter what someone signs up for. That's not how the world works. More efficient processes take over less efficient ones. Paying someone 7k to work on something for 2 weeks is much less efficient than generating a similar image in 2 minutes for 25 cents. Few people are going to be so enamored with the image that it would matter if it's not quite as good (though it may be better). > Not every BS we invent is a possitive. Nor is "increased technology" == "better". Anything that increases efficiency without hurting people is a good thing and it's why we enjoy the quality of living we do now.