3 ms·
> That doesn't obviate the rights of the other Masimo shareholders It does if they willingly sell their shares to Apple > Then they buy the 50.1% of company f
by ffgjgf1 3y ago
> That doesn't obviate the rights of the other Masimo shareholders
It does if they willingly sell their shares to Apple
> Then they buy the 50.1% of company for $500M and write off the debt to their subsidiary
Well that would not be legal.
They’d use their position as the majority shareholder to buy out everyone else and delist the company (of course they could still not sell, they’d just end up having shares in a private company)
- ajross 3y ago> It does if they willingly sell their shares to Apple Why would they do that? That's literally just giving away money. I still think you're failing to understand the principle at work here. You can "control" a public company with a 50.1% share, that doesn't allow you to steal from the remaining shareholders. That's what shareholder lawsuits are about: the shareholders collectively feel that the company is not acting in the interests of its owners and sue. Now, sure, often this is abused. Often the suits are baseless and mostly just attempts by law firms to squeeze some dollars out of the process. But the actions described in this subthread are exactly why they are allowed in the first place. You can't do that.