2 ms·
That's literally contrary to what FSF says. Please read: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html . For e
by gpderetta 3y ago
That's literally contrary to what FSF says.
Please read: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html .
For example:
Apache License, Version 2.0
This is a free software license, compatible with version 3 of the GNU GPL.
Or:
Expat License [this is the MIT license]
This is a lax, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL.
The fact that a license allows derivative work to take away the 4 freedoms don't make the license not a free software license. An end user in reception of a permissively licensed free software can make full use of the 4 freedoms.