Interesting that it says it is slower. It may actually be slower, but tends to not suffer as much degradation as the Go's GC. In other words, on my test setup u

Interesting that it says it is slower. It may actually be slower, but tends to not suffer as much degradation as the Go's GC. In other words, on my test setup using Go, I get ~1k rps once I hit memory limits, but with tinygo I get 7k rps once I hit memory limits. So it might be "slower" but it looks like it may be more efficient as well.